Origin of the Name.

Composite name of a midrash, consisting of two parts, whose final redaction took place at the end of the tenth century of the common era. The first part is called "Seder Eliyahu Rabbah" (thirty-one chapters); the second, "Seder Eliyahu Zuṭa" (fifteen chapters). A distinct reference to this midrash occurs in the Talmud in Ket. 106a: "Elijah used to come to R. Anan, upon which occasions the prophet recited the Seder Eliyahu to him. When, however, R. Anan had given this decision [one previously narrated in the Talmud] the prophet came no more. R. Anan fasted in consequence, and begged forgiveness, whereupon the prophet came again; but R. Anan had such great fear of Elijah that, in order to avoid seeing him, he made a box and sat in it until the recitation was over" (but see Jew. Encyc. i. 552, s.v. Anan). Hence, according to Rashi, the midrash has the two names, "Rabbah" for the earlier, and "Zuṭa" for the later lectures. Anan was aBabylonian amora of the third century. The collection of baraitot concerning him, referred to in this midrash, is cited in the Babylonian Talmud under the title "Tanna debe Eliyahu" (see below); and the utterances in question are found in the midrash itself. The tosafot to Ketubot (106a, s.v. ) say that the midrash consists of a large book and a small one. R. Nathan in his "'Aruk" (s.v. , ii.) says: "The midrash contains baraitot which the prophet taught to Anan, and consists of two parts, a large seder with thirty chapters, and a small seder with twelve chapters; and all of the Tanna debe Eliyahu cited in the Talmud is to be found in these baraitot." The inner connection between these two midrashim is a loose one, and it is only in sections 5 to 10 that the second refers to the first.

The Underlying Principle of the Book.

The underlying theme of the Tanna debe Eliyahu, which, with many interruptions, runs through the whole work, is the evolution of the world-system. The midrash calls the single periods of the history of man "shiṭṭot" (series). The first series, which deals with the beginning of the world and extends to the moment when man was driven out of Eden, consists of two subsections, (a) "Ma'aseh Merkabah" and (b) "Ma'aseh Bereshit." The six series of the world-system, however, were created in the divine mind even before any being, with the exception of Israel, existed. They were: (1) the divine law (); (2) hell () and (3) paradise (), or punishment and reward in the future world; (4) the throne (), or the divine government of the world; (5) the name of the Messiah (), or the restoration of the universe when about to be destroyed; and (6) the Temple (), or the dependence of man upon God. Even before these six foundations, however, Israel was, as stated above, already in being in the divine mind, because without Israel there could have been no Torah (Friedmann, "Seder Eliyahu," p. 161).

The second series embraces the period from the expulsion of man from Eden to the Flood. In the ten generations from Adam to Noah man did not adhere to "meekness," did not do what was right (ib. p. 80), but fell lower and lower until he practised violence, theft, immorality, and murder. For this reason his destruction became a necessity (ib. p. 190).

The Periods of Jewish History.

The third series extends from the Flood to King Manasseh of Judah. It treats of the time of the study of the Law, of the priestly office, of the kingdom, and of the end of Israel's prosperity through the evil administration of Manasseh. In the days of Abraham the period of "tohu wa-bohu" (confusion) ceases and the 2,000 years of law begin. This time is divided into the following periods: (1) the sojourn of the children of Israel in Egypt, the Exodus, to Joshua; (2) the kingdom of love extending to Samuel; (3) the kingdom of fear, to the time of Elijah; (4) the kingdom of truth, to the time of Jeroboam II.; (5) the time of Israel's salvation from oppression under Hezekiah; (6) from the time of Hezekiah to the reign of Manasseh (see Friedmann, "Mebo," v. 108).

The fourth series is filled with "meekness" (ib. p. 163). Whoever studies the Torah receives "meekness" as a reward. In addition there is a second recompense, which is the Mishnah. In this introduction of the Mishnah there is a trace of apology intended for those who believe that only the Torah was delivered on Sinai. The fifth series extends from King Manasseh to the building of the Second Temple (ib. p. 163). The last series treats of the future. God, surrounded by all the saints, sits in His bet ha-midrash and counts up the generations of the different periods of time, what they have learned, and what reward they shall receive therefor (ib. p. 4). The future of these saints will be like the beginning of the life of man (ib. p. 164).

The Three Periods.

These six series are again divided into three main periods: (1) the present world; (2) the Messianic period; and (3) the future world. These are subdivided into: (a) 2,000 years of confusion ("tohu"); (b) 2,000 years of the Torah; (c) 2,000 years of the Messiah; (d) inauguration of a general peace; (e) the future world (ib. p. 115).

Besides this fundamental idea both parts of the midrash emphasize the importance of virtue, of a religious life, and of the study of the Law, and exhort to repentance and almsgiving, greater tolerance toward both Jews and non-Jews, diligent study and respect for scholars, modesty and humility, and the avoidance of non-Jewish manners and customs. The midrash, further, attempts to prove that all human life is based on the two extremes, toil in the sweat of the brow, and the regaining of the freedom of the soul. Hence it begins with the expulsion of Adam from Eden (Gen. iii. 24), and closes with the same theme. The cherubim in Eden are identified with man, and are the symbol of the reward of well-doing; the flaming sword is hell, the punishment for evil-doing. The way to the tree of life is said to be "derek ereẓ" (good behavior); while the guarding of the tree of life is like the guarding of the word of God. By derek ereẓ the midrash understands that which is fitting, useful, and honest; and these three qualities are the fundamental principles upon which the human world-system and society rest. An example of derek ereẓ in this midrash is the following: The princes of the Philistines possessed derek ereẓ, because when the Philistines wished to convey the Ark to the Israelites they would not send it back without sacrifices (I Sam. vi. 3; Friedmann, l.c. p. 58). On the other hand, the inhabitants of Bethshemesh did not possess it, inasmuch as instead of bowing before the Ark they rejoiced and danced before it boldly, so that misfortune came upon them and 50,000 of them fell (ib.).

Quality of Derek Ereẓ.

The opposite of derek ereẓ is "to walk in the crooked way," i.e., to do unworthy deeds and to give oneself up to immorality. Yet no nation of the world, with the exception of Egypt, has sunk so low as this. In ordinary life, however, the transgression of a command or prohibition, indecency, or even theft is a most pronounced opposite of derek ereẓ; and every father of a family should strive to preserve those depending on him from these vices, because they belong to thoseevils which might bring about the destruction of the world.

The twelve chapters of the second part of the midrash are characterized by the fact that the narratives showing why in this world things often go amiss with the good and well with the wicked, are commonly introduced by the words "It happened" () or "Once on a time" (). The midrash is sometimes interspersed with very beautiful prayers (see, for example, Friedmann, l.c. pp. 6, 18, 19, 28).

The Tanna debe Eliyahu is the only haggadic work which contains a rabbinic-karaitic polemic. In the second chapter of the second part is an account of a meeting of the author with a Karaite, who possesses a knowledge of Scripture, but not of the Mishnah; the differences discussed, however, are not important. The polemical attitude is much more noticeable in ch. xv. of the first part. There the following points are treated in detail: (1) washing the hands (comp. Ḥul. 106a; Shab. 62b; Soṭah 4b); (2) slaughtering (comp. Ḥul. 27a); (3) partaking of human blood (comp. Ker. 20b); (4) prohibition against eating fat (comp. Lev. vii. 23; Ker. 4b; Pinsker, "Liḳḳuṭe Ḳadmoniyyot," p. 20); (5) robbery from a Jew and from a non-Jew (comp. B. Ḳ. 113b); (6) degrees of relationship as bearing on marriage (comp. "Eshkol ha-Kofer," p. 117b); (7) grades of purity (comp. ib. p. 111b; Shab. 13a). Unlike other polemics, this one is not couched in acrimonious terms; but it adopts a mild, conciliatory tone.

Composed in the Tenth Century.

As to the time of the composition of the work, all scholars agree in assigning it to the end of the tenth century; but as to the place where it was written, authorities differ. Whereas certain scholars (e.g., Zunz, Rapoport, Bacher, Oppenheim, and Hochmuth) suppose Babylonia or Palestine, Güdemann is of the opinion that the work was written in Italy, or at least that its author must have been an Italian who had traveled a great deal and had been as far as Babylon, who learned there of the polemic between the Rabbinites and Karaites, but who abstained from mentioning Europe or Italy because he considered he would be likely to create a greater impression among his fellow countrymen by relating observations which he had made abroad. Furthermore, the fact that he knew nothing of Babylonia beyond its name shows that he could not have been a native of that region. Derenbourg also places the origin of the work in Rome. Grätz goes farthest of all, by simply identifying the Babylon of the midrash with Rome, and the fights of Gog and Magog described in the work with the devastating invasion of the Hungarians into Italy from 889 to 955. The most radical opponent of this view is Friedmann. For him all arguments concerning the age of the Tanna debe Eliyahu and against its identification with the Seder Eliyahu mentioned in Ket. 10b, are only superficial and only apparently sound; and he accordingly assigns the origin of the work "eo ipso" to Babylonia.

The age of the midrash is approximately ascertainable by three data contained in the book itself. (1) In ch. ii. the author speaks of the seventh century of the 2,000 years of the Messianic period as having passed; this period began in 242 C.E., hence the time of writing must have been the tenth century. (2) The second datum relates to the temporal reckoning of the jubilees, and is treated by Rapoport in "Toledot de-R. Natan," p. 144. (3) The third datum (ch. xxx.) indicates that nine centuries had passed since the destruction of the Temple; hence the last redaction of the midrash falls in the interval between 968 and 984.

Examples of Exegesis.

Of especially original midrashim contained in the work a few may be noticed here. On the passage "and set me down in the midst of the valley which was full of bones" (Ezek. xxxvii. 1-11) it is said, "Instead of 'bones' [] should be read 'tree of death' []; for it was the same tree which, through Adam's disobedience, brought death to him and to all his descendants" (v. 24). "'And this man went up out of his city yearly' [I Sam. i. 3]: from these words it appears that Elkanah went to Shiloh four times a year, three times in accordance with the legal prescription, and once in addition, which last journey he had assumed voluntarily" (Friedmann, l.c. p. 47). "On the day of Adam's death his descendants made a feast, because on account of his age he had long been a burden to himself and to them" (ib. p. 81). "'I will not execute the fierceness of mine anger' [Hos. xi. 9]: God has sworn to His people that He will not give them in exchange for another people, nor change them for another nation" (Friedmann, l.c. p. 127). "'The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God' [Ps. xiv. 2]: a man may not say in his heart, 'This world is a tohu wa-bohu; I will give myself up to sensual pleasures and will retire from the world'" (xxiii. 127-128). "From the words 'Israel was holiness unto the Lord' [Jer. ii. 3] it follows that the holiness of God, of the Sabbath, and of Israel is the same" (Friedmann, l.c. p. 133).

The passages in the Talmud cited in Tanna debe Eliyahu are: Shab. 13a; Pes. 94a, 112a; Meg. 28b; Ḳid. 80b; 'Ab. Zarah 5b, 9a; Sanh. 92a; Tamid 32a. Those cited in the Talmud under "Tanu Rabbanan" and found also in this midrash are: Shab. 88b and Giṭ. 36b = Tanna debe Eliyahu (ed. Friedmann), p. 78; Pes. 49a = ib. p. 30; Pes. 49a = ib. p. 68; Suk. 52a = ib. p. 20; R. H. 18a = ib. p. 53; Meg. 14a = ib. p. 82; Ḳid. 82a = ib. p. 101; B. Ḳ. 97b = ib. p. 21; B. B. 90b = ib. p. 77; B. B. 147a = ib. p. 157; Sanh. 19a = ib. p. 147; Sanh. 43b = ib. p. 102; Sanh. 109a = ib. p. 168; Sheb. 39a = ib. p. 132; Yeb. 62b = ib. p. 78. Furthermore, in the midrash are found sentences of the following amoraim: Johanan, Joshua b. Levi, R. Abbahu, and Eleazar.


The first edition of the midrash appeared at Venice in the year 1598, prepared from a copy dated 1186. In 1677 an edition by Samuel b. Moses Haida, with changes in the text and with a commentary ( ), appeared in Prague. The text itself was presented in a "nusḥa ḥadasha" (new text) and in a "nusḥa yeshana" (old text), being wholly distorted from its original form by Talmudic and cabalistic interpolations. This edition consists of three parts, the first two of which contain the text of the Rabbah and the Zuṭa (thirty-one and twenty-nine chapters respectively). These two parts are preceded by prefaces bearing the titles "Mar Ḳashshisha" or "Sod Malbush ha-Neshamah" (Mystery of the Clothing of the Soul) and "Mar Yanuḳa" or "Sod Ḥaluḳa de-Rabbanan" (Mystery of the Clothing of the Rabbis). Then follows an introduction (common to part ii. and part iii.), with the title "Sha'ar Shemuel" (Gate of Samuel), and a third part consisting mainly of an exegesis of ch. xx.

The following editions are specially to be recommended, namely: that by Jacob b. Naphtali Herz of Brody, with a commentary, "Yeshu'at Ya'aḳob" (Zolkiev, 1798); that by Abraham b. Judah Löb Schick, with the commentary "Me'ore Esh" (Sidlkov, 1835); that by Isaac Elijah b. Samuel Landau, with a commentary, "Ma'aneh Eliyahu" (Wilna, 1840). Among the best editions is the Warsaw one of 1880 containing both texts. The latest edition appeared in Vienna in 1900 and 1903, under the titles "Seder Eliyahu Rabbah" and "Seder Eliyahu Zuṭa," after a Vatican manuscript of the year 1073, critically revised, and with a commentary entitled "Me'ir 'Ayin," and a voluminous introduction by M. Friedmann. In this edition Seder Eliyahu Zuṭa is divided into fifteen chapters.

  • Bacher, in Monatsschrift, xxiii. 267 et seq.;
  • idem, in R. E. J., xx. 144-146;
  • T. Derenbourg, in R. E. J. ii. 134 et seq., iii. 121-122;
  • Friedmann, introduction (Mebo) to his ed. of Seder Eliyahu;
  • Grätz, Gesch. 3d ed., v. 294-295;
  • Güdemann, Gesch. ii. 50, 52 et seq., 300-303;
  • Hochmuth, in Neuzeit, 1868, Nos. 23 et seq.;
  • Oppenheim, Bet Talmud, i. 304 et seq.;
  • Rapoport, Toledot de-Rabbi Natan, in Bikkure ha-'Ittim, x. 43;
  • J. Theodor, in Monatsschrift, xliv. 380-384, 550-561;
  • Zunz, G. V. ii. 119-124, Frankfort-on-the-Main, 1892.
W. B. S. O.